{
  "cutoff": "2026-10-20",
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "C01",
      "screenshot": "image(7).png",
      "claim": "H100 rental index USD 2.85/GPU-hour.",
      "evidence_class": "VERIFIED PUBLISHED OBSERVATION",
      "sources": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "USD/GPU-hour; neocloud index; October 20",
      "support": "Dated headline confirms the number.",
      "counterevidence": "Stale FAQ and index-versus-realized-price distinction.",
      "conclusion": "Use as an attributed index observation.",
      "confidence": "High",
      "unresolved_question": "Underlying realized invoices and service mix.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C02",
      "screenshot": "image(7).png",
      "claim": "H100 is 53% above its February 2025 low.",
      "evidence_class": "UNRESOLVED HISTORICAL COMPARISON",
      "sources": [
        "S01",
        "S02"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Percentage versus same-vintage trough",
      "support": "A 1.86 trough would imply 53.23%.",
      "counterevidence": "Exact trough and historical restatement bridge not recovered after December 2025 revision.",
      "conclusion": "Keep conditional; do not describe as verified like-for-like recovery.",
      "confidence": "Low for comparability",
      "unresolved_question": "Original daily series and restated vintage.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C03",
      "screenshot": "firefox_uYv6MoyK3Z.png",
      "claim": "Rising inputs and falling token prices necessarily destroy margins.",
      "evidence_class": "ANALYST INFERENCE",
      "sources": [
        "S03",
        "S04",
        "S05",
        "S38"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Cost and realized revenue per equivalent useful task",
      "support": "Higher rent, power or financing costs can squeeze a cohort.",
      "counterevidence": "Throughput gains can reduce cost per useful task; rent is revenue to owners but expense to renters.",
      "conclusion": "Conditional mechanism, not a mechanical sector conclusion.",
      "confidence": "High conceptual distinction",
      "unresolved_question": "Matched realized revenue and full costs by hardware/customer cohort.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C04",
      "screenshot": "image(8).png",
      "claim": "NVIDIA delivers roughly 50 times tokens per MW.",
      "evidence_class": "COMPANY TECHNICAL CLAIM",
      "sources": [
        "S03",
        "S04"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "DeepSeek R1; HGX H200 versus GB300 NVL72",
      "support": "Published 2.8m/54,000 equals 51.85.",
      "counterevidence": "Exact matched production context, latency, precision and TCO assumptions incomplete.",
      "conclusion": "Attribute as a benchmark comparison; not evidence of paid sell-through.",
      "confidence": "High attribution; medium production transfer",
      "unresolved_question": "Matched production run and full utilization/cost scope.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C05",
      "screenshot": "image(8).png",
      "claim": "Token cost falls from USD 4.20 to USD 0.12 per million.",
      "evidence_class": "COMPANY TECHNICAL CLAIM",
      "sources": [
        "S03",
        "S04"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Published modelled cost per million tokens",
      "support": "Company table supports 35-fold ratio.",
      "counterevidence": "1.41/(90*3600)*1m gives 4.35185, not 4.20; published rounding/basis is unresolved.",
      "conclusion": "Use rounded vendor table, flag incomplete arithmetic reconciliation.",
      "confidence": "High attribution",
      "unresolved_question": "Unrounded inputs and exact TCO definition.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C06",
      "screenshot": "image(8).png",
      "claim": "The illustrative system earns about 42 times more profit.",
      "evidence_class": "HYPOTHETICAL CALCULATION",
      "sources": [
        "S03"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Illustrative surplus under given prices and sold volumes",
      "support": "50*(5-0.12)/(10-4.20)=42.06897.",
      "counterevidence": "Requires every 50-fold unit sold; fixed costs, replacement, financing and taxes not reconciled.",
      "conclusion": "42.07 times modelled surplus, not demonstrated net profit or ROIC.",
      "confidence": "High arithmetic; unverified investment outcome",
      "unresolved_question": "Paid demand, cost boundary and cohort cash flow.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C07",
      "screenshot": "image(8).png",
      "claim": "Google monthly tokens grew from 9.7T to over 3.2Q.",
      "evidence_class": "COMPANY OPERATING CLAIM",
      "sources": [
        "S06"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "All Google surfaces; May 2024 versus May 2026",
      "support": "Keynote reports the series and about 480T in 2025.",
      "counterevidence": "Paid share, workload and compute intensity unknown; API per-minute metric separate.",
      "conclusion": "Strong technical usage evidence; not causal elasticity or electricity demand.",
      "confidence": "High attribution",
      "unresolved_question": "Paid successful tasks, mix, cache and collections.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C08",
      "screenshot": "image(8).png",
      "claim": "OpenAI USD 0.50 versus USD 50 output prices show AI price inflation.",
      "evidence_class": "OBSERVED MENU; UNSUPPORTED TREND INTERPRETATION",
      "sources": [
        "S07"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "USD/million output; standard below 272K; same date",
      "support": "Official Luna and Astra rate card.",
      "counterevidence": "Different models and capabilities at one point in time.",
      "conclusion": "Product differentiation, not fixed-quality inflation.",
      "confidence": "High",
      "unresolved_question": "Task-equivalent prices over time and discounts.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C09",
      "screenshot": "image(9).png",
      "claim": "Recursive self-improvement makes the demand outcome inevitable.",
      "evidence_class": "SPECULATION",
      "sources": [],
      "unit_scope": "Unspecified horizon and mechanism",
      "support": "No causal or economic evidence established in supplied material.",
      "counterevidence": "Capability improvement alone does not establish paid demand, resource use or investor returns.",
      "conclusion": "Exclude from base case; discuss as speculative upside mechanism.",
      "confidence": "Low empirical support",
      "unresolved_question": "Operational definition, measured improvement and monetization.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C10",
      "screenshot": "image(9).png",
      "claim": "Frontier labs capture the value from cheaper inference.",
      "evidence_class": "ANALYST INFERENCE",
      "sources": [
        "S07",
        "S20",
        "S29",
        "S30"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Lab economics after full development and service costs",
      "support": "Distribution, product differentiation and customer productivity can support value.",
      "counterevidence": "Open models, competition, R&D costs and pass-through can favor users or other suppliers.",
      "conclusion": "Plausible conditional outcome, not a universal conclusion.",
      "confidence": "Moderate mechanism; low allocation certainty",
      "unresolved_question": "Paid retention, full cash costs and competitive renewal pricing.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C11",
      "screenshot": "image(9).png",
      "claim": "Governments will not allow the credit cycle to stop.",
      "evidence_class": "SPECULATION",
      "sources": [
        "S33"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Unspecified program, jurisdiction or creditor",
      "support": "Incentives can affect location and funding.",
      "counterevidence": "No enforceable unconditional rescue guarantee established.",
      "conclusion": "Do not model a bailout as assured.",
      "confidence": "High that claim is unverified",
      "unresolved_question": "Specific statute, appropriation, beneficiary and conditions.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C12",
      "screenshot": "image(10).png",
      "claim": "Power, labor and permitting bottlenecks constrain deployment.",
      "evidence_class": "SUPPORTED MECHANISM",
      "sources": [
        "S25",
        "S27",
        "S28",
        "S32",
        "S19"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Project critical path and acceptance date",
      "support": "Primary energy/grid sources and contract acceptance conditions support constraints.",
      "counterevidence": "Projects differ; capable operators and prepared sites can shorten delays.",
      "conclusion": "Use project-specific stages, not an aggregate demand-collapse inference.",
      "confidence": "High mechanism",
      "unresolved_question": "Current utility acceptance, equipment delivery and commissioning evidence.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C13",
      "screenshot": "image(10).png",
      "claim": "Half of announced projects are delayed or cancelled.",
      "evidence_class": "UNVERIFIED QUANTITATIVE CLAIM",
      "sources": [
        "S25",
        "S27"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Share of a defined announcement cohort",
      "support": "Duplicate requests and staged ramps are documented.",
      "counterevidence": "No defensible 50% denominator, project list or delay/cancellation definition recovered.",
      "conclusion": "Do not publish 50% as an established statistic.",
      "confidence": "Low",
      "unresolved_question": "Cohort, observation window, deduplication and disposition audit.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C14",
      "screenshot": "image(10).png",
      "claim": "The cycle must peak in 2027-28.",
      "evidence_class": "SPECULATION / SCENARIO",
      "sources": [
        "S24",
        "S25",
        "S15"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Timing of investment, prices or credit turning point",
      "support": "Delivery and refinancing cycles can create stress.",
      "counterevidence": "Timing depends on demand, power, contracts, replacement and capital availability.",
      "conclusion": "Use as a scenario, not an inevitable forecast.",
      "confidence": "Low timing confidence",
      "unresolved_question": "Comparable renewals, funded completions and creditor behavior.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C15",
      "screenshot": "image(10).png",
      "claim": "Long contracts funded with short borrowing are intrinsically attractive.",
      "evidence_class": "ANALYST INFERENCE",
      "sources": [
        "S15",
        "S16",
        "S18",
        "S19"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Customer cash duration versus debt maturity and economic asset life",
      "support": "Enforceable contracts can improve underwriting.",
      "counterevidence": "Refinancing, rate resets, acceptance, cancellation and repricing can break the match.",
      "conclusion": "Compare three clocks; short borrowing is not inherently safer.",
      "confidence": "High",
      "unresolved_question": "Amortization, guarantees, hedges and residual values.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C16",
      "screenshot": "image(20261020-223132).png",
      "claim": "Power-rich land is the decisive scarce asset.",
      "evidence_class": "ANALYST INFERENCE",
      "sources": [
        "S25",
        "S27",
        "S32"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Deliverable, permitted and accepted MW",
      "support": "Scarce energization can make prepared sites valuable.",
      "counterevidence": "Land or nominal capacity alone is not completed cooling, networking, customer acceptance or cash.",
      "conclusion": "Value the deliverable critical path, with full capital and contract obligations.",
      "confidence": "High mechanism",
      "unresolved_question": "Evidence of energized, customer-accepted and billable capacity.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C17",
      "screenshot": "image(20261020-223132).png",
      "claim": "China enjoys uniformly easy financing and abundant power, leaving chips as its only constraint.",
      "evidence_class": "UNSUPPORTED GENERALIZATION",
      "sources": [],
      "unit_scope": "China-wide costs and availability",
      "support": "No comparable project-level evidence established here.",
      "counterevidence": "Regional, credit, grid and equipment differences prevent a blanket inference.",
      "conclusion": "Do not use as a verified comparative advantage.",
      "confidence": "Low",
      "unresolved_question": "Matched financing, tariffs, delivered-power dates and hardware access by project.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C18",
      "screenshot": "image(20261020-223210).png",
      "claim": "DeepSeek processes 155T tokens/day and earns USD 38/GPU-hour.",
      "evidence_class": "COMPANY TECHNICAL/ECONOMIC CLAIM",
      "sources": [
        "S08"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "V4.1 Flash cluster; valley pricing; measured feed and billing mix",
      "support": "Company Q&A states both figures.",
      "counterevidence": "Hardware count/type, period, occupancy and revenue accounting not disclosed sufficiently.",
      "conclusion": "Attribute; do not elevate to audited operating margin.",
      "confidence": "High attribution; low comparability",
      "unresolved_question": "Fleet denominator; paid/cache mix; recognized, collected or imputed revenue.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C19",
      "screenshot": "image(20261020-223210).png",
      "claim": "USD 38 minus USD 1-4 rental gives unlimited profit.",
      "evidence_class": "UNSUPPORTED PROFIT INFERENCE",
      "sources": [
        "S08"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Mismatched GPU-hour cost and service revenue",
      "support": "No evidence establishes the suggested margin.",
      "counterevidence": "Storage, network, capital replacement, model costs and unmatched rental services omitted.",
      "conclusion": "Reject subtraction as a profit calculation.",
      "confidence": "High",
      "unresolved_question": "Matched whole-cohort revenue, cash costs and capital.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C20",
      "screenshot": null,
      "claim": "SpaceX has an under-one-year deployment payback.",
      "evidence_class": "MANAGEMENT CLAIM",
      "sources": [
        "S11",
        "S13"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Payback with undisclosed capital/cash-flow scope",
      "support": "CFO statement in Q3 transcription.",
      "counterevidence": "Annual pricing basis and denominator not defined; current scarcity pricing can later change.",
      "conclusion": "Attribute and mark scope unresolved; not whole-project equity IRR.",
      "confidence": "High attribution; low investment transfer",
      "unresolved_question": "Original A/V, written definition, cash costs, capital included and duration.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Not applicable",
      "provenance": "Follow-up research or cross-cutting analytical test; not represented as a literal screenshot claim"
    },
    {
      "id": "C21",
      "screenshot": null,
      "claim": "SpaceX operates 1.7GW of compute.",
      "evidence_class": "PRIMARY COMPANY DISCLOSURE",
      "sources": [
        "S09"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Installed GPU nameplate September 30",
      "support": "Earnings release capacity footnote.",
      "counterevidence": "Excludes facility overhead; does not equal actual average draw, accepted external service or annual MWh.",
      "conclusion": "Use precise installed-nameplate definition.",
      "confidence": "High",
      "unresolved_question": "Actual draw, availability, billed occupancy and external/internal mix.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Not applicable",
      "provenance": "Follow-up research or cross-cutting analytical test; not represented as a literal screenshot claim"
    },
    {
      "id": "C22",
      "screenshot": "image(20261020-223242).png",
      "claim": "SpaceX deployment and power targets can be added together.",
      "evidence_class": "MANAGEMENT GUIDANCE WITH DENOMINATOR RISK",
      "sources": [
        "S09",
        "S11"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "2.5-3GW YE2026 compute; +10GW 2027 compute; +20GW 2027 power/cooling; training Rubin units",
      "support": "Targets appear in company materials/transcription.",
      "counterevidence": "Different scopes, timing and possible overlap; monthly preparation is not accepted production.",
      "conclusion": "Keep compute, power/cooling and training targets separate and non-additive.",
      "confidence": "High classification; low delivery certainty",
      "unresolved_question": "De-duplicated commissioned capacity and acceptance evidence.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Root visually inspected supplied image; no unavailable author/link reconstructed",
      "provenance": "Supplied screenshot, visually inspected by root"
    },
    {
      "id": "C23",
      "screenshot": null,
      "claim": "SpaceX headline multi-year cloud term locks in long-duration cash.",
      "evidence_class": "CONTRACT CLAIM REQUIRING QUALIFICATION",
      "sources": [
        "S10",
        "S12"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Cash protection after ramp and notice periods",
      "support": "June offering describes Anthropic service term and price.",
      "counterevidence": "90-day exit after initial period; generic cloud disclosure also allows exits.",
      "conclusion": "Underwrite enforceable cash protection rather than headline term.",
      "confidence": "High",
      "unresolved_question": "Current amended terms, ramp and any termination notice.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Not applicable",
      "provenance": "Follow-up research or cross-cutting analytical test; not represented as a literal screenshot claim"
    },
    {
      "id": "C24",
      "screenshot": null,
      "claim": "More token usage establishes Jevons backfire.",
      "evidence_class": "UNSUPPORTED CAUSAL INFERENCE",
      "sources": [
        "S05",
        "S06",
        "S39"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Same useful service demand, resource intensity and realized price",
      "support": "Efficiency can enable cheaper services and more activity.",
      "counterevidence": "Other demand drivers and changing task/token mix; resource savings can outpace demand growth.",
      "conclusion": "Backfire requires total resource use above the counterfactual; observed tokens alone are insufficient.",
      "confidence": "High conceptual distinction",
      "unresolved_question": "Quality-adjusted paid demand, causal price change, compute and energy measures.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Not applicable",
      "provenance": "Follow-up research or cross-cutting analytical test; not represented as a literal screenshot claim"
    },
    {
      "id": "C25",
      "screenshot": null,
      "claim": "Positive operating cash establishes adequate infrastructure returns.",
      "evidence_class": "UNSUPPORTED FINANCIAL INFERENCE",
      "sources": [
        "S14",
        "S15"
      ],
      "unit_scope": "Cohort cash after replacement, financing and required return",
      "support": "Positive operating cash can fund investment.",
      "counterevidence": "Economic replacement, cost of capital, debt and tax may absorb cash.",
      "conclusion": "Reconcile cash operations to capital recovery and investor return.",
      "confidence": "High",
      "unresolved_question": "Economic asset life, replacement cash flow, tax and financing schedule.",
      "as_of": "2026-10-20",
      "screenshot_review": "Not applicable",
      "provenance": "Follow-up research or cross-cutting analytical test; not represented as a literal screenshot claim"
    }
  ]
}